![]() ![]() You can find the Tailscale IP in the admin console, or by running this command on the subnet router. You need an IP address on Vlan 2 on Switch 2 for that to work. Check that you can ping your new subnet routers’s Tailscale IP address from your personal Tailscale machine (Linux, macOS, Windows, etc). Go to solution miket Contributor 07-26-2012 09:10 PM - edited 03-07-2019 08:00 AM I have a 2811 hook up to a 3750. If only Switch1 is a Layer 3 switch, you need a common management network on both switches, which can be Vlan 2. However, when I try to ping one machine from the other, I get Destination host unreachable from the machine that is sending the ping. ![]() Both machines can successfully ping both routers, and can use the internet just fine. If you have both as Layer 3, the default gateways need to be configured on the directly connected switches. Router 2 is upstairs, connected to router 1 by Cat5, providing wifi to the two machines in question (this is 192.168.1.254). You need to decide if you want one or both switches to be Layer 3. Username cisco privilege 15 password 7 0822455D0A16 No service timestamps debug datetime msec Below are the working configs if only Switch1 is Layer 3: Note1: It is WRONG to route different subnet masks in the same network/vlan this is just a explanations as to why it works in certain cases for certain specific IPs. You need an IP address on Vlan 2 on Switch 2 for that to work. Edit: Re-do the answer as the IPs in the question changed. ![]() If you have both as Layer 3, the default gateways need to be configured on the directly connected switches. ![]() Passthrough=no src-address-list=Sabanet-UsersĪdd action=masquerade chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.4.0/24Īdd action=masquerade chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.3.0/24Īdd distance=5 gateway=192.168.2.1 routing-mark=User-IrancellĪdd distance=10 gateway=192.168.1.You need to decide if you want one or both switches to be Layer 3. Passthrough=no src-address-list=Irancell-UsersĪdd action=mark-routing chain=prerouting new-routing-mark=User-Sabanet \ Since there seems to a another subnet behind Router1 that Router2 cant see, make sure you add an appropriate static route to R2, or set up a routing protocol. Do the same thing related to 0/0/1 interface of the router. A /30 subnet wastes 50 of its address range. Then open the CLI of the router and assign an new IP address which is in the same subnet as PC0 & PC1 to the 0/0/0 interface. This is my tracert output in my PC for one of arbitrary wifi devices: The nearest addresses first approach looks like this: Loopback: ping 127.0.0.1 Localhost: ping 192.168.2.200 Local router/default gateway: ping 192.168.2. I did that through policy based routing and it is working, but the problem is that I can not ping from ether3 device to ether4 devices and vice versa I want to my PC and some wifi devices access to internet by modem router 1 and any other device access to internet by modem router 2 I have two modem routers that they are DHCP servers themselve, modem router 1 is connected to mikrotik router by ether1 and mikrotik get IP from that and modem router 2 is connected to mirkotik by ether2 and mikrotik get IP from that. My PC is connected to router ether3 port by a LAN cable I have some wifi devices that connect to my wifi access point, I ran a DHCP server on ether4 and so all of wifi devices are in subnet 192.168.4.0/24 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |